Legal Opinion

Fujifilm Corp. v. Yang

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 2014No. B243770PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Cindy Yang appeals from the judgment for Fujifilm Corporation (Fuji). According to Yang, Fuji split its cause of action against her. She contends Fuji could have pursued its claims for fraudulent transfers against her in a prior federal court proceeding, and therefore the trial court should have applied res judicata and claim preclusion to bar those claims here. We find that the trial court correctly ruled that res judicata and claims preclusion did not apply. We therefore affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 2005, respondent Fuji sued Yet “Jimmy” Chan and others, including…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crown Imports, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Hi-Desert Medical Center v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Boyd v. Freeman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Boyd v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Estrada v. Barahona CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API