Legal Opinion

State v. Hibbs

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 14, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cttbiam.

Defendant was convicted in the Ewing Township Municipal Court of violating the provisions of N. J. 8. A. 2A:170-29 (3) in that he had made obscene telephone calls to two women on various dates. He was again convicted by the County Court on a de novo trial on the record before the Municipal Court, and sentenced to a four months prison term in the Mercer County Workhouse.

It is undisputed that the obscene remarks were proscribed by the statute. The only issue was the identity of the caller. The women who heard the remarks could not identify the *110caller other than to opine that the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. People v. HolowkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Malvasi v. MalvasiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. State v. ChatmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. State v. HibbsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API