Legal Opinion

State v. Lechner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 95-21PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

App. 26(B)(2) states:

“An application for reopening shall contain all of the following:

(( * * *

“(c) one or more assignments of error or arguments in support of assignments of error that previously were not considered on the merits in the case by any appellate court or that were considered on an incomplete record because of appellate counsel’s deficient representation;
“(d) a sworn statement of the basis for the claim that appellate counsel’s representation was deficient with respect to the assignments of error or arguments raised pursuant to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Van Hook v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  2. State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. Block, 87488 (4-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. DavieOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. LechnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API