Pisa v. Holy
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action on the case under Dram-Shop Act. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Abner Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard .in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Mb.. Justice Stein
delivered the opinion of the court.
First. It is claimed that the motion in arrest of judgment should have been granted because there is a misjoinder of counts in this, that the last three, being common law causes of action, were improperly joined to the first two, which are statutory. Counsel cite no authorities to support their contention, and we do not deem it well taken. Section 9 aforesaid gives “a right of action” to all who shall be injured in certain modes there pointed cut against the persons causing "the injury. This right of action, although not so named, is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hackett v. SmelsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Krug v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Albrecht v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Kellerman v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Kennedy Bros. v. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morgan v. Kirk Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Railway Co. v. KrempelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
- Hopkins v. PowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985