Legal Opinion

Boulware v. Boulware

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1974No. 7421DC658PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in failing to find sufficient facts to support the judgment. We have carefully reviewed the judgment and conclude that the court did find sufficient facts to support it. The assignment of error is overruled.

By his second assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in awarding plaintiff exclusive possession of the homeplace until the youngest child reaches her majority.

The court found as a fact that plaintiff and defendant owned the homeplace as tenants by the entirety and that plaintiff and the four…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teague v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Cobb v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Towers v. TowersSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1979
  3. Arnold v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API