Legal Opinion

Baton Rouge Cigarette Service v. Bloomenstiel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1956No. 4246PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

88 So.2d 742 (1956)

BATON ROUGE CIGARETTE SERVICE, Inc.,

v.

Lester BLOOMENSTIEL.

No. 4246.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 29, 1956.

Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, for appellee.

LOTTINGER, Judge.

Petitioner, Baton Rouge Cigarette Service, Inc., is the applicant in rule for a preliminary injunction against its former employee, Lester Bloomenstiel, praying that defendant show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue restraining him from using confidential information obtained from applicant's…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin-Parry Corp. v. New Orleans Fire Detection ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Ridge Park v. Police Jury, Etc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  3. Jones v. Ernst ErnstSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  4. First Nat. Bank v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. WimberlyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Haughton Elevator Division v. STATE, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  4. Cloud v. DyessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Marine Forwarding & Shipping Co. v. BaroneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API