Legal Opinion

United States Ice Co. v. Courts Building Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1942No. Gen. No. 42,131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSukely

Plaintiff brought suit under section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (ch. 48, par. 166, Ill. Rev. Stat. [ Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 143.44]) alleging that both it and defendant were operating under the act and that an employee of plaintiff, namely Frank Carrion, came to his death through the negligence of the defendant.

The purpose of section 29 has been stated by Mr. Angerstein in his book on the Workmen’s Compensation Act (page 957) as requiring “indemnification of an employer who has not been negligent out of the recovery against a third person whose negligence caused the injury.”

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huff v. Peoria & Eastern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  2. Lauer v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. De Carrion v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Smiley v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Marathon Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Davis v. Marathon Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API