Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Jackson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1926No. 25459Published

1DissentSmith, C. J.

Judge Cook, Judge Holden, and I are of the opinion that the right conferred by the third section of this statute, on a person convicted thereunder, of electing whether he will execute a bond to support his wife and children, or pay a fine, or suffer imprisonment, as the one or the other may be imposed, is not a pardon within the meaning of that term as used in the Constitution.

“The doctrine of the authorities is, that ‘a pardon reaches both the punishment prescribed for the offence, and the guilt of the offender,’ and that ‘it releases the punishment and blots out of existence the guilt, so…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Austin v. AustinMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. PageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  4. Jones v. Board of Registrars of Alcorn CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Ware v. SandersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API