Legal Opinion

Feige v. Burt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Snow, .i. Trover by Ernest Feige against Wellington B. Burt and the Home National Bank of • East Saginaw. From a judgment for defendants *

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants, in an action of trover, to recover the value of 20 certificates, representing 800 shares of stock in the Feige-Silsbee Furniture Manufacturing Company, claimed by him to have been unlawfully converted by defendants. The circuit judge directed a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff has appealed the case to this court.

Prior to 1888 the plaintiff was one of the incorporators of the Feige-Silsbee Furniture Manufacturing Company (which name was changed, later, to the Feige Desk Company). He was a borrower of the defendant bank., November 8, 1888, he pledged to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stearns v. MarshNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Van Norman v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Day v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Blair v. ComptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Heath v. Silverthorn Lead Mining & Smelting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. Salmon Weed & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Kukla v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mechanics & Metals National Bank of New York v. PingreeIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Austin v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Glenn v. FerrellUtah Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API