Legal Opinion
Martin v. Applied Cellular
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 21, 1999No. CV-99-214-JDPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Martin v . Applied Cellular CV-99-214-JD 09/21/99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE John H. Martin, Jr. v. Civil N o . 99-214-JD Applied Cellular Technology, Inc. O R D E R Plaintiff John H. Martin, Jr., brought an action against Applied Cellular Technology, Inc. (“ACT”) alleging that ACT is liable for instituting a wrongful civil action and for malicious prosecution and that ACT intentionally and negligently caused Martin to suffer extreme emotional distress. ACT now moves to dismiss Martin’s claims, asserting that Martin has failed to state a claim for which…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States of America v. Avx Corporation, National Wildlife Federation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Whelan v. AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.