Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Panetta

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1957No. Appeal, 331Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

January 7, 1957:

Vincent Panetta, Angelo Massone, and James Crawford were indicted on charges of receiving stolen goods, accessory after the fact to larceny, and conspiracy. Panetta and Massone pleaded not guilty to all charges and asked for a jury trial. Crawford pleaded guilty to receiving stolen goods and asked to be tried by a judge without jury on the other charges. Judge Kun of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County, before whom the defendants appeared, decided to try all cases together and simultaneously, thus sitting as a judge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Holmes' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. MacK AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API