Legal Opinion
Fusi v. O'Brien
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 16, 2010No. 09-1060PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Alfred Fusi (“Fusi”) appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts’ denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and request for an evidentiary hearing. See Fusi v. O’Brien, 588 F.Supp.2d 158 (D.Mass.2008). In his habeas petition, Fusi alleged that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to prepare for trial. Because Fusi failed to exhaust his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in state court, the district court should have dismissed his petition…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- SM Kids, LLC v. Google LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Steven Moss v. Gary MiniardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- In re Children of Kacee S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- In re Children of Kacee S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- (HC) Gutierrez Jr. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.