Legal Opinion

Bischoff v. Bischoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Special Term, Kings County. Action by Kranklin J. Bischoff against Henry Bischoff. Motion for change of venue denied. Defendant appeals. The following is the opinion of Cochrane, J., in the court below: The question for determination on this motion is not whether the plaintiff has a residence in New York county, but whether he has a residence in Westchester county.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Special Term, Kings County. Action by Kranklin J. Bischoff against Henry Bischoff. Motion for change of venue denied. Defendant appeals. The following is the opinion of Cochrane, J., in the court below: The question for determination on this motion is not whether the plaintiff has a residence in New York county, but whether he has a residence in Westchester county. A person may have one or more residences, as distinguished from a domicile; and, if the plaintiff at the time of the commencement of this action had either an actual residence or a domicile in Westchester county, the…

1Per curiam

Order denying motion to change venue affirmed, with $io costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Cochrane at Special Term.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. In re RooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Marks v. Collins Building Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API