Fuller v. Sechelski
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Chief Justice.
This was a proceeding to probate a lost will as a muniment of title. The trial was to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment denying probate of the will of Rufus L. Sechelski, deceased. The judgment recites certain findings of fact and conclusions of law. Roy L. Fuller, a beneficiary under the will, appeals. The judgment will be affirmed.
Rufus L. Sechelski executed a will on September 18, 1963. In 1969 he suffered a stroke and upon being released from the hospital moved to a nursing home in Nava-sota, Texas. Helen Mercado, a niece, handled the business…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Farr v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Sparkman v. Estate of MasseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- McClusky v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Matter of Estate of McGrew, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
- in the Estate of Ruby P. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006