Legal Opinion

County of Lee v. Stevens

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 3, 1982No. 21660PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

The sole issue before us is: Does the authority to set the tax rate for property taxation purposes in Lee County belong to its governing body, Lee County Council, or to its Auditor, Cecil Stevens?

The facts are not in dispute. On June 26,1979, County Council adopted a budget for the 1979-80 fiscal year and enacted by ordinance a tax rate of 118 mills. Thereafter, the Auditor determined that this rate would result in a tax surplus and reduced it to 115 mills. The Auditor was then duly directed before the Circuit Court to show cause why he did not accept the initial tax rate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meredith v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. Powell v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Simkins v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brackenbrook North Charleston, LP v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Angus v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Angus v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Brackenbrook North Charleston, LP v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Brackenbrook North Charleston, LP v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API