Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Geneva
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Callahan and Balio, JJ. (dissenting).
We disagree with the majority’s conclusion that, “[bjecause petitioner’s retired members do not have any contractual rights with respect to health insurance benefits, they may not challenge the change in benefits.” In our view, Supreme Court properly concluded that the City’s determination to change the health insurance benefits paid to retirees violated the established past practice of providing a certain level of benefits to them.
It is well established that substantive rights may arise not only through collective negotiations, but also through…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Board of Cooperative Educational Services Sole Supervisory District v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Unatego Non-Teaching Ass'n v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Incorporated Village of Hempstead v. Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- State v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982