Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. Hartman
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
This action was instituted for the cancellation of three policies of insurance for disability from bodily injury or from sickness, the recovery of the sums theretofore allegedly mistakenly paid the respondent, the restraining of respondent from commencing or proceeding in any further action against complainant upon the policies, and for enjoining the respondent from asserting any claims against the complainant on account of the policies of insurance.
On the day following the date of service of subprana upon the respondent in this suit, he instituted an…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Risty v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.