State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Justice.
The defendants Joseph L. Johnson and Joseph G. Grace have appealed from their conviction of contempt of court for alleged jury tampering. They contend, generally, that their convictions should be set aside because (1) neither the charges nor the evidence constitute contempt, and (2) prejudicial error was committed in the conduct of the trial.
On September 14, 1964 the Charleston County Grand Jury indicted Joseph L. Johnson, Jr., (son and nephew, respectively of the defendants Joseph L. Johnson and Joseph G. Grace), along with two others, for rape, assault with intent to ravish,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hurley v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- State v. NathansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- The STATE v. GoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- State v. WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Toyota of Florence, Inc. v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Floyd v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. Club Náutico de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- State v. KennerlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.