Legal Opinion

Eastman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided September 22, 1982No. 07-81-0231-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Appellant David Eastman appeals his conviction for delivery of lysergic acid diethylamide and jury-assessed punishment of twenty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant in two grounds of error asserts first, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the allegations in the indictment, and, second, that the trial court erred in charging on the law of parties because the evidence did not raise that issue. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In order to properly discuss appellant’s first ground a brief resume of the testimony is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Medellin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. McCuin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Apodaca v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Michael v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Crew v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  5. Longest v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API