State v. Moore
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREW J. HIGGINS, Special Judge.
Appeal from convictions of burglary, second degree. Appellants question the sufficiency of the evidence. Affirmed.
Appellants contend (I) that the State’s evidence “was circumstantial, was insufficient to disprove the innocence of the defendants, and merely raised a suspicion of guilt.” See State v. Walker, 365 S.W.2d 597 (Mo.1963); State v. Schrum, 347 Mo. 1060, 152 S.W.2d 17 (1941); State v. Whitaker, 275 S.W.2d 322 (Mo.1955); State v. De Witt, 191 Mo. 51, 90 S.W. 77 (1905); State v. Murphy, 356 Mo. 110, 201 S.W.2d 280 (banc 1947); State v. Farmer, 490 S.W.2d…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. EatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. EnochsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WynnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. OwsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982