Legal Opinion

State v. Valdiviezo-Martinez

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 21, 2021No. 111447PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 111,447 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. VICTOR VALDIVIEZO-MARTINEZ, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An employee can commit identity theft, as defined in K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-6107, by using the social security number of another to deceive an employer and induce the employer to rely on the deception and provide employment and its benefits. The employee receives an economic benefit from the deception, even if the employee earns those wages. 2. The Legislature defined a continuing offense in K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-6107(a) by providing that identity…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  3. Quinn v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2023
  4. State v. ManczukSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
  5. State v. RinkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API