Legal Opinion

Catchpole v. Narramore

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 17, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

This cause was decided in the Superior Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs who are the appellees herein. Both sides agree that - there is no dispute as to the facts.

The Narramores sued the Catchpoles, the Whalens and the Beaches. Only the Catch-poles were served and only they appeared in the Superior Court. - Certain real property in California was subject to three deeds of trust. The first deed of trust was in favor of the Holmbergs. The purchase money note which is the subject of this matter now under consideration was secured by the second…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. MidgettArizona Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Catchpole v. NarramoreArizona Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API