Legal Opinion
United States v. Indoor Cultivation Equipment from High Tech Indoor Garden Supply
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 26, 1995No. 93-2817PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRABB, District Judge.
Claimant-appellant Rayburn Pollard, Jr. appeals from the denial of his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to set aside a default judgment entered against his indoor marijuana cultivation equipment, pick-up truck, powerboat and trailer in a forfeiture action brought by the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 881(a)(2), (a)(4) and (a)(6). Pollard suffered the default by failing to answer the government’s in rem complaint. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm in part and reverse in part, holding that the district court properly declined to vacate the judgment against…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Salvatore Di Mucci, Robert Di Mucci and Anthony Di MucciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Gregory C. Jones, for the Estate of Barbara S. McEwen v. Sandra Lee Phipps, A/K/A Sandra R. PhippsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Edward Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., Royal Insurance Company of Canada Canadian General Insurance Company and Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Be2 LLC v. IvanovCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Provident Savings Bank v. Nick PopovichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Carter v. FennerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- William F. Grun v. Pneumo Abex Corp., Pa Holdings Corp., and the Henley Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.