Legal Opinion

Wyker v. Willingham

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided March 22, 1944No. 5399PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MULLINS, Distict Judge.

This cause is submitted upon the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action. The motion is made under rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, upon the grounds (1) that this court does not have jurisdiction over either the subject-matter or the person of the defendant and (2) that the claim sued upon is barred by the statute of limitation of two years.

The suit is for the recovery of estate taxes paid upon the estate of John Daniel Wyker, deceased, the plaintiff being the duly appointed and qualified executor under the last will of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. A. G. Reeves Steel Const. Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Sherwood Bros. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Casalduc v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Joint Council Dining Car Employees Local 370 v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Rollaway Window Screen Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Rutledge v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Getter v. BeckmanMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. McMichael v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API