Legal Opinion

Seely v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 2007No. CA CR 06-1318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John B. Robbins, Judge.

Appellant John Seely appeals his conviction for the rape of his then three-year-old daughter, as found by a jury in Pulaski County Circuit Court. Appellant posits a single argument for reversal: that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay evidence of his daughter through the testimony of her mother and a social worker. He contends that this violated his right secured by the Sixth Amendment to confront witnesses against him. We agree that the testimony of the social worker included inadmissible hearsay evidence in violation of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Edward E. Bordeaux, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Seely v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Seely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API