Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth ex rel. Kelly v. Commonwealth Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1973No. Appeal, No. 79Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien :

The majority bases its reversal of - the decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, sitting as Commonwealth Court, on the policy provision limiting the time within which contingent liabilities might be levied against CMIC’s insureds to one year from the date of expiration or cancellation of their respective policies. The majority reasons that the insurance commissioner approved that policy language and is, therefore, estopped, as statutory liquidator, from ignoring *183it. While that reasoning has first blush appeal, further reflection…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Keystone Indemnity ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Brown v. Grand View Auditorium, Inc., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1939
  3. Kelly v. BremmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API