Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 10, 1987No. 86-0314PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.

LaVerne Brooks appeals the denial of his unemployment compensation claim based upon findings by the Labor and Industry Review Commission that he was unable to work and unavailable for work. Brooks claims that the compensation eligibility standard used to determine when a claimant is physically able to or available for work violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amend*108ment to the United States Constitution. We affirm the order.

Brooks worked for forty years at Connor Forest Industries before he was laid off from his job as a night foreman. Upon processing Brooks’ claim for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API