State Ex Rel. Scioto-Sandusky Conservancy District v. Dunn

Assuming, but not deciding, that relator is authorized to bring the instant action, we recognize thát relator is concerned in the matters pending before respondent by reason of the special assessment of 3/10 of a mili levied by relator on the assessed valuation of the property of its district. However, relator is not a party to any of the proceedings pending before respondent, which it seeks to prohibit. ■ None of the complainants before the respondent are parties to the instant proceeding.

The petition also contains the allegation that respondent “will, unless prohibited by this Honorable…