State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District Board

NORRIS, Judge,

specially concurring:

¶ 48 The first pivotal issue in this appeal is whether the AAG had standing to sue MCCCD for the declaratory and injunctive relief it requested. See supra ¶7.1 agree with the majority the AAG had standing to pursue the requested declaratory and injunctive relief against MCCCD. Thus, I concur in the majority’s decision at ¶¶ 7-11.

¶ 49 The second pivotal issue in this appeal is whether MCCCD may offer in-state tuition to DACA recipients who otherwise meet admission requirements. Following the AAG’s lead, the majority resolves this issue by principally focusing…