Legal Opinion

Waterman-Bic Pen Corp. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 22, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEYET, District Judge.

Both the plaintiff and defendant move for summary judgment in this action for refund of federal excise taxes brought by the plaintiff-taxpayer Waterman-Bie Pen Corporation. The parties have entered into a stipulation of all the relevant facts pertaining to the taxpayer’s claim and there remain no genuine issues as to any material facts.

The taxpayer, a manufacturer of pens and other writing instruments, during the period from November 20, 1958. through March 31, 1960 paid the manufacturer’s excise tax on various of its products subject to the tax. Of the amount so paid,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Koshland v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoffman Motors Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API