Legal Opinion

Hawks v. Mayor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1896No. 17,795PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against the appellants upon an agreed statement of the facts under section 562, R. S. 1894 (R. S. 1881, section 553). The only error assigned here is that “The court erred in rendering judgment against appellants, C. & E. Hawks, and in issuing a peremptory writ of mandate against them.” The agreed statement is as follows:

“The mayor and common council of the city of Goshen, Indiana, the board of commissioners of Elk-hart county, and C. & E. Hawks, by agreement submit to the Elkhart Circuit Court for decision the following controversy: In the year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. PurdueIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Sanxay v. HungerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. HascallIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Walter v. WalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Day v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Seisler v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Duzan v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. General Asbestos & Supply Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Hill v. Indianapolis & Vincennes RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API