Legal Opinion

Cameron-Hawn Realty Co. v. City of Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, the Cameron-Hawn Realty Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 27tli day of February, 1909, upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, J.:

On the 1st day of April, 190o, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the city of Albany to furnish the material and labor *723necessary to construct an asphalt pavement in one of the streets of said city. Among the conditions of the contract were the following : “ In consideration of the price for laying and maintaining the pavement the contractor must keep the pavement in repair, as hereinafter provided, for a period of ten years from -the date of the acceptance of the work by the city. The maintenance consists in repairs, renewals and furnishing materials necessary to maintain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Asphalt Paving & Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cameron-Hawn Realty Co. v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. City of Leavenworth v. Green River Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API