Moore v. Servicemaster Commercial Services
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtHawkes, C.J.
In this workers’ compensation appeal, we are asked to address the applicability of the common-law concept of sheltered employment to periods of temporary partial disability (TPD); and the forfeiture of benefits under the defense found in section 440.15(6), Florida Statutes (2007). Here, the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) rejected Claimant’s argument that the concept of “sheltered employment” should apply and denied TPD benefits, along with penalties, interest, costs, and attorney’s fees, pursuant to section 440.15(6), based on Claimant’s unjustified refusal of suitable employment.
We also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LiggonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Shaw v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Arnold v. Florida's Blood Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Bado v. Canteen Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. ToscanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Carcamo v. Business Representation InternationalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Employbridge and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. v. Viviana Llanes RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Hawkins v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- MJM Electric, Inc./OCIP and Sedgwick CMS v. William SpencerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019