Legal Opinion

Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 19, 1941No. C. D. 497PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beown, Judge:

This suit against the United States was brought at New York, and there tried, to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been illegally exacted upon a certain importation' of a substance classified by the collector of customs under paragraph 1536 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a manufacture of wax and assessed with duty at 20 per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested, claiming the merchandise to be duty free under paragraph 1796, Tariff Act of 1930, as Wax: Animal, vegetable, or mineral; or to be free under paragraph 1733 as “Oils, mineral * * * paraffin * * * not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  2. Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  3. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API