Legal Opinion

People v. Ayala

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1981No. 80-473PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of possession of more than 30 grams of a controlled substance (heroin) and sentenced to 4 years in the penitentiary. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 56)2, par. 1402(a)(1).) On appeal, defendant contends (1) he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt because the State’s expert testified that only one of two bags contained heroin and (2) the prosecutor’s improper remarks during closing argument denied him a fair trial.

It is uncontroverted that defendant was found in possession of two bags of a substance the State claimed was heroin. Chicago…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. MartinezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. People v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. State v. JesterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. People v. GamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. StarksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. People v. FaysomAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. RuckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. People v. CartalinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API