Legal Opinion
Seefeldt v. Incledon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 1999No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying, upon renewal, the motion of Lawrence Schuyler, D.O., Fishkill Family Health and Mignonette Mae Willkom, M.D. (defendants) to change venue of this action from Erie County to Dutchess County. In support of the motion, defendants submitted evidence that all of the parties resided in Dutchess County at the time the action was commenced (see, CPLR 503 [a]; Labissiere v Roland, 231 AD2d 687; Siegfried v Siegfried, 92 AD2d 916). The statements in the affidavits submitted by plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Siegfried v. SiegfriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Martinez v. SemicevicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Mandelbaum v. MandelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Labissiere v. RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rodriguez v. St. Paul's Catholic ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrasi v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Francis v. Midtown Express, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015