Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. William Penn Business Institute

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1966No. Appeal, No. 382PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appeal quashed. Appellant attempts to appeal from the dismissal of preliminary objections, filed in her behalf and in behalf of the corporate defendant. The court below properly refused to entertain the corporate preliminary objections since there is no indication the appellant had any authority to file objections in its behalf. As to her own preliminary objections, no appeal is allowable from their dismissal. As stated by this court in Wandzilak v. Huss, 419 Pa. 541; “We *492stated in Dozor Agency v. Rosenberg, 403 Pa. 237: ‘However, generally speaking, an Order overruling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Stadler v. Mt. Oliver BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Powell v. ShepardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Dozor Agency v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Grosso v. EnglertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. MacKanick v. RubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Ransom Township v. MascheskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Brown EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API