Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 2001No. CR 01-351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, Terrance and Tamagum Antonio Robinson, advise this court that the original record and exhibits cannot be located. They move this court to permit a copy of the trial transcript to be substituted for the original.

Because this is a criminal case, we direct the Supreme Court Clerk to accept the substituted copy of the trial transcript as of the time when all of the attorneys of record certify to the Clerk, by affidavit, that the copy of the trial transcript is true, accurate, and complete. Cf. Mitchell v. State, 345 Ark. 359, 45 S.W.3d 846 (2001) (per curiam). We further direct…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API