Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 10, 2016No. CR-16-207Published

1DissentRobin F. Wynne, Justice

| ^Because I believe that Thompson’s appeal has been rendered moot by his having served the punishment imposed, I would dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

An examination of the majority opinion will reveal why the better course would be to dismiss Thompson’s appeal. Assuming the majority is correct to reverse on the merits, it has applied the wrong disposition to the case. The majority opinion reverses and dismisses based on the determination that a due-process violation resulted from Thompson’s failure to receive notice of the contempt hearing. The proper disposition in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Swindle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API