Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of November 4, 2003 General Election

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2003Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

I must respectfully dissent, at least in part. This court has long held that, “While it is true that a defect which is minor or technical in nature will not void an otherwise valid ballot, violations of substantive provisions of the Code cannot be overlooked on the pretext of pursuing a liberal construction.” In re April 10, 1984 Election of East Whiteland Township, Chester County, 85 Pa.Cmwlth. 594, 483 A.2d 1033, 1036 (1984). Nothing in the present case causes me to conclude that we should depart from this longstanding principle. I fully agree with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Union Electric Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Genkinger v. New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. In re April 10, 1984 ElectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API