Legal Opinion

Munger Automobile Co. v. American Lloyds of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 13, 1924No. 106PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

Appellee filed this suit against appellant, alleging that it had, for a valuable consideration, issued to Bari Pain an insurance policy in the sum of $3,500, against loss on account of the^t of a Cadillac automobile; that thereafter the car was stolen, and, by reason of the insurance policy issued, it became obligated to and did pay Earl Pain said $3,500, and took an assignment of the policy and claim for (he lost automobile. It was admitted in the trial court that the automobile in question was worth $3,500. Appellee alleged that Earl Pain delivered the automobile in question to appellant in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lafflin v. . Buffalo Southwestern R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Fletcher v. Baltimore & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Hubbell v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Exporters' & Traders' Compress & Warehouse Co. v. SchulzeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Allright, Inc. v. ElledgeTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Anchor Casualty Co. v. Robertson Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Spears Dairy, Inc. v. BohrerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Darden v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Ablon v. HawkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API