Legal Opinion

Bazzle v. Huff

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 18, 1995No. 24317PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Chief Justice:

Appellant, Carolyn Bazzle, initiated a hearing before the Workers’ Compensation Commission to settle various matters including payment of attorney’s fees. The single commissioner issued an order requiring respondent to refund attorney’s fees in the amount of $650 paid prior to September 1990 for appearances in supplementary hearings. The commissioner concluded the commission had discretionary authority to approve attorney’s fees. The full commission reversed the single commissioner and the circuit court affirmed. We affirm.

The key issue is whether the Workers’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Triska v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Ford v. Allied Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sgm-Moonglo, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. South Carolina Ambulatory Surgery Center Ass'n v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. South Carolina Department of Revenue v. Sandalwood Social ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Rhame v. Charleston County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API