Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mathes Brierre Architects, a Professional Corporation v. karlton/isg Enterprises, LLC, International Sales Group, LLC, and J.S. Karlton Company, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 2020No. 2019-CA-0357Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MATHES BRIERRE * NO. 2019-CA-0357 ARCHITECTS, A PROFESSIONAL * COURT OF APPEAL CORPORATION * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA KARLTON/ISG ENTERPRISES, LLC, * INTERNATIONAL SALES GROUP, LLC, AND J.S. * KARLTON COMPANY, INC. ******* LOBRANO, J., CONCURS IN PART, DISSENTS IN PART, AND ASSIGNS REASONS. JCL I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part as set forth in the following opinion: In this contract case, appellee, Mathes Brierre Architects, a Professional Corporation (“Mathes”), filed its petition in May 2015 and sought to recover sums due under an architectural contract…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API