Bond v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The merit of two points presented by the bill of exceptions is to be determined *572by two principles of law which we think quite well settled. Without particular reference, therefore, to all the matters referred to in the statement of facts, it is enough to say that the essential facts may be sufficiently stated by saying that the order of the judge “that the plaintiff, and her husband, George H. Bond, vacate the premises above described, on or before the 16 day of April, 1932; and in the event the premises are not vacated on or before said date, the sheriff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. CarltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Russell v. Mohr-Weil Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Vaughn v. YawnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Glover v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Beck v. KahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Braswell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Stephens v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Oliver v. ForsheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Pearson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.