Legal Opinion

Oppenhimer v. Finance & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1925No. 2323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

The parties below occupied the same position they do in this court; that is to say, Henry W. Oppenhi-mer, as trustee in bankruptcy for one W. A. .Lee, trading as the National Motor Company, was there plaintiff and is plaintiff in error here, and the Finance & Guaranty Company, defendant in error here, was defendant there. For brevity, they will be referred to as the trustee and the vendor, respectively.

The bankrupt, one W. A. Lee, traded as the National Motor Company. No one else was interested in the business, which was that of buying and selling automobiles. The vendor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Hoge & Hutchinson v. TurnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  3. Chesapeake Shoe Co. v. SeldnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903
  4. Edmunds & Blackford v. Hobbie Piano Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  5. Partlow v. LickliterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Janney v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. Stark v. Baltimore Soda Fountain Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1952
  3. Waltham Piano Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  4. Gomez v. MaddenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API