Legal Opinion

Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the ad damnum clause of the complaint. Absent prejudice to a defendant, “a motion to amend the ad damnum clause, whether made before or after trial, should generally be granted” (Loomis v Civetta *1113Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, 23, rearg denied 55 NY2d 801; see, Smith v Lift-A-Loft Equip., 210 AD2d 989). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.— Amend Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Smith v. Lift-A-Loft Equipment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API