Legal Opinion

Witten v. Wegman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 30, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

This suit was begun by John Wegman, a nephew of Conrad Wegman, deceased, to have the will of Conrad Wegman construed and to have that part of said will which attempted to create a trust, declared void. Earl S. Witten, the appellant, is a nephew of Ettie Wegman, deceased, and claims the property mentioned in said will as the heir at law of said Ettie Wegman. Earl 5. Witten was made a party defendant and filed answer and cross-complaint and prayed that the title to the property be declared to be in him and that the complaint of plaintiff and cross-complaint of William Wegman be dismissed. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booe v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Stewart v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Ingraham v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Sawyer v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re Eggan's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Morris v. DoschSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company v. VotolatoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API