Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1994No. 24598Published

1Opinion of the Court

869 P.2d 795 (1994)

In re Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or in the Alternative for a Writ of Mandamus.

The Honorable Jerry Carr WHITEHEAD, Petitioner,

v.

NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE, Respondent.

No. 24598.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

February 18, 1994.

Ohlson & Springgate, Hamilton & Lynch, Reno, Gentile, Porter & Kelesis, Laura Wightman FitzSimmons, Las Vegas, for petitioner.

Frankie Sue Del Papa, Atty. Gen., Brooke Nielsen, Deputy Atty. Gen., Carson City; Donald J. Campbell, Las Vegas, for respondent.

OPINION

ZENOFF, Senior Justice.[*]

Statement of the Case

This opinion is written to…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API