Legal Opinion

Highler v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 2005No. 02A03-0505-CR-203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-Defendant Marshall Highler ("Highler") appeals his conviction for Rape as a Class B felony.1 We affirm.

Issues

On appeal, Highler raises three issues, which we reorder and restate as:

I. Whether the jury selection system in Allen County deprived Highler of the right to a trial by a jury of his peers in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments;

II. Whether the trial court improperly upheld the State's peremptory challenge to the only African-American venire person merely because the State offered a race-neutral, but religious discriminatory,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  2. Highler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Jeffery Eugene Keith v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  4. Jeffery Eugene Keith v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API