Legal Opinion

Ellenbecker v. Volin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1955No. File 9383PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSickel, J.

This is an action commenced by Jo Ann Ellenbecker, as plaintiff, against Verlynne V. Volin and Paul R. Billingsley, physicians and surgeons practicing as partners, defendants, to recover damages for injuries suffered by plaintiff which, it is claimed, resulted from malpractice and lack of skill in performing an operation. The jury returned a verdict for defendants and plaintiff appealed.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that plaintiff consulted defendants as physicians and surgeons, and upon their advice *606submitted to an operation for the removal of an ovarian cyst, in which operation both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kabatchnick v. Hanover-Elm Building Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Signal Mountain Portland Cement Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Schultz v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. StringerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Grimes v. ToensingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Randle v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Munce v. MunceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Von Sternberg v. CaffeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Bachand v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Carraro v. Wells Fargo Mortgage & EquityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API